-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/21/12 9:44 AM, Todd Herman wrote: >> -----Original Message----- From: Peter Saint-Andre >> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 >> 11:40 AM To: XMPP Standards Cc: Todd Herman Subject: Re: >> [Standards] Question regarding XEP-0077 (In-Band Registration) >> > On 9/21/12 9:32 AM, Todd Herman wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] >>>>> [mailto:standards- [email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew >>>>> Wild Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 11:17 AM To: XMPP >>>>> Standards Subject: Re: [Standards] Question regarding >>>>> XEP-0077 (In-Band Registration) >>>>> >>>>> Hi Todd, >>>>> >>>>> On 20 September 2012 15:53, Todd Herman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I wanted to confirm something in section 3.1.1 of >>>>>> XEP-0077. It seems to suggest that you can register with >>>>>> a server prior to authentication, meaning that no account >>>>>> is required. We are attempting to do this, using >>>>>> OpenFire, right after TLS but before SASL. The >>>>>> appropriate Iq is sent and we get the correct response. >>>>>> However, when we send the next Iq with the username and >>>>>> password, > we >>>>>> get back a Failure element with “Not-Authorized”. I >>>>>> wanted to be sure that I am understanding section 3.1.1 >>>>>> correctly before I pursue other >>>>> options. >>>>> >>>>> Which iq do you send and which response do you get? Could >>>>> you perhaps paste an example XML log? >>>>> >>>>> Is in-band registration definitely enabled on the server? >>>> >>>> I apologize for not responding sooner but the issue is now >>>> resolved. It was an issue with SASL still happening do to an >>>> asynchronous operation running in the background. I think >>>> we may have an additional question as we have a new >>>> discrepancy but we are conducting some additional testing >>>> before bringing it up. I might be able to head off some >>>> questions by asking everyone what they think the term >>>> "service", referenced in the XEP is referring too. >>>> >>>> The XEP lays out two distinct uses for in-band registration: >>>> a service registering (I assume on behalf of another user) >>>> and the user registering themselves during the negotiation >>>> process with a server. > > Actually, the scenarios are user registering with server > (necessary in order to get on the network in the first place) and > user registering with add-only service once on the network.
s/add-only/add-on/ >> Ok. I think I get you. So we have the first one taken care of. >> The user, without an account on the XMPP server itself, can >> register themselves then login. If I am understanding the >> second server, we are talking about registering with some >> service, such as MUC, and NOT another method for registering with >> the server itself. Is that correct? Yes, exactly. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBcnLkACgkQNL8k5A2w/vw+HQCgw30AjPiEUNDP2a09U1tI0bc9 +IUAoLHqAtwE6MU0uE0MLhUPogiZyS/1 =FgLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
