Sorry for the double, please consider this message as wrong.

On 10/08/2012 11:36 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 11:18 PM, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
>> Hello!
> Hello Konstantin,
> 
>>
>> 28.09.2012, 16:23, "Sergey Dobrov" <[email protected]>:
>>> On 09/28/2012 06:35 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>>>>  Another bigger problem is smilies. It's not obvious when the
>>>>>  client should render smilies and when not. I'd prefer to forbid any
>>>>>  text-based smilies in the XHTML-IM content
>>>>  Some of us actually prefer textual emoticons. :)
>>>
>>> Actually, me too :) But them have some problems to parse here, it adds
>>> some extra <img> tags actually in the mark up. :) So I'd prefer client
>>> to replace textual smilies BEFORE send them to the network. Obviously,
>>> the plain text representation of a message will be unchanged.
>>>
>>>>  Feel free to look at the old XEP-0038 for further considerations.
>>>>>  but such way we really need a standardized way to attach images to
>>>>>  a body.
>>>>  IMHO that would be XEP-0231.
>>>
>>> Yes, it seems to be pretty good here but it will be impossible to read
>>> images when your competitor is offline that can be nasty. But I don't
>>> know how to solve the problem anyway.
>>
>> The only solution I see is adding special considerations for smilies. The 
>> smilies should be converted to some special type of images to allow client 
>> on the other side translate it.
>> I can suggest two possible syntaxes:
>> 1. <img /> element without "src" attribute at all, which "alt" attribute 
>> contains textual representation of the smilie, so translator either 
>> translate it and display smilie image, or display alternative text if it 
>> cannot translate (or do not want to translate it at all, eg. smilie 
>> tranlation is diabled).
> Unfortunately, we have to be compatible with XHTML, I think :)
> 
>> 2. <img /> element with "src" attribute, containing URL with special scheme 
>> (eg. "smilie:"), whith path, containing properly escaped textual 
>> representation of the smilie.
> 
> Don't know how complex a process of inventing a new URI schema but I
> think that actually transmission of smilies as images is okay too but it
> needs to be thought over and over again :)
> 
>>
>> With my best regards,
>>                                   Konstantin
>>
> 
> 


-- 
With best regards,
Sergey Dobrov,
XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.

Reply via email to