-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/17/12 5:41 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre > <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 10/15/12 12:21 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: >>> I agree with that sentiment. Green-colored text and strange >>> fonts were popular when MySpace was popular. This is something >>> from the past, not the present or future. >>> >>> The present and future require semantic elements (such as >>> <blockquote/>) and attributes (such as those used by RDFa). >> >> I think that's right. So how about the following change... >> >> OLD The use of structural elements is NOT RECOMMENDED where >> presentational styles are desired, which is why very few >> structural elements are specified herein. Implementations SHOULD >> use appropriate 'style' attributes (e.g., <span >> style='font-weight: bold'>this is bold</span> and <p >> style='margin-left: 5%'>this is indented</p>) rather than XHTML >> structural elements (e.g., <strong/> and <blockquote/>) wherever >> possible. >> >> NEW Where strictly presentational style are desired (e.g., >> colored text), it might be necessary to use use 'style' >> attributes (e.g., <span style='font-color: green'>this is >> green</span>). However, where possible it is instead RECOMMENDED >> to use appropriate structural elements (e.g., <strong/> and >> <blockquote/> instead of, say, style='font-weight: bold' or >> style='margin-left: 5%'). > > As long as we're not changing the subset of tags allowed, this > seems sensible to me.
Right, no changes to the subset of tags. I'll publish a new version and the Council can decide how it would like to proceed. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC2DVAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzjJQCfazLLMzfqzVP4w+VdfbHIwp49 LpYAni4ll1Va3kXWO+4UXoz5m9TZmwct =H5KZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
