Looks good - worth making the point about the transience of a label
catalog. Slight grammar error though: "Two identical catalog requests may
returned different results".

Another thought - if there is a chance that the catalog may change between
the client requesting it and then sending a message with a label from the
catalog, it may be worth including some guidance for when a message is
sent with a label which is no longer acceptable (I.e. Is there a specific
error that the server should return?).

Also, I wonder if, as a future update, some kind of hint from the server
about catalog lifetime would be useful. Or this may just be a solution in
search of a problem!

Cheers,

Ash

On 05/01/2013 03:32, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Kurt Zeilenga has submitted version 1.1 of XEP-0258. This requires
>Council approval. The diff and rendered file are here:
>
>http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0258/diff/1.0/vs/1.1rc1
>
>http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0258-1.1.html
>
>Kurt told me he can attend the Council meeting in which this is
>discussed, if desired.
>
>Peter
>
>- -- 
>Peter Saint-Andre
>https://stpeter.im/
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAlDnnsAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vygsQCfc6lCOcG9MpZTjWACa9Ecge3q
>cOsAoKDp/L5XYaX7h0wv6uUqrtMdtlp4
>=ikhw
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to