On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Matt Miller <[email protected]>wrote:
> To be clear, 'stamp' is the equivalent of 'seconds', in absolute terms. > The recipient wouldn't deduct 'seconds' from 'stamp' to get the ultimate > result. > Yes...if both present then on the system initially sending the stanza, stamp = now() - seconds. No deductions needed if 'stamp' is present. > > Also, would 'stamp' always be in terms of UTC, or are other offsets > permitted? I can see pros and cons for both sides of that fence. > I think the value of 'stamp' would be according to XEP-0082, which allows for optional time zone specifier at the end (just 'Z' at the end meaning UTC). > > I've got no objections to this proposal, and it seems to meet the > threshold for a Final XEP. > Great.
