Don't you guys think that the fact that PEP has subscribers from a
user's roster does such feature dangerous? Not all users are ok with
sharing their rosters.

I think that this feature (friends sharing) is completely different and
should be a subject of another XEP.

On 02/11/2013 05:04 PM, Ashley Ward wrote:
> 
> Le 08/02/2013 08:48, Tim a écrit :
>> The idea here is to use PEP to store a list of pubsub nodes and
>> allowing a user to notify its contacts when he wants to share some of
>> theses.
> 
> Quite like the idea of making this information available on a pep node,
> but I think you would need to consider differentiating by service. For
> example I may be subscribed to several nodes for a non-movim based pubsub
> service, but movim doesn't care a jot about those, and would have to go
> through a lengthy discovery process to find out that they're meaningless
> to it.
> 
> There's nothing to stop you adding your own namespace as a pep node,
> specific to movim, and just storing this in there. This also wouldn't need
> any changes to the spec either.
> 
> 
> Something like:
> 
> <iq type='set' from='[email protected]' id='1'>
>   <pubsub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub'
> xmlns:m="http://movim.eu/movims-awesome-namespace";>
>     <publish node='urn:movim:pubsubpublic'>
>       <items>
>          <item><m:subscription server='pubsub.jabber.org'
> node='spongebobfanclub' /></item>
>          <item><m:subscription server='pubsub.xmpp.eu' node='news'
> /></item>
>       </items>
>     </publish>
>   </pubsub>
> </iq>
> 
> 
> Just a thought
> 
> --
> Ash
> 
> 
> 


-- 
With best regards,
Sergey Dobrov,
XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.

Reply via email to