On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi folks, > While I was originally writing 289, I misinterpreted a requirement > I'd heard, and this led me to believe that master/slave mode was > needed. I've since convinced myself that only the master/master mode > is needed. If M/S is never going to be used, I'd like to remove it > from the spec. Please raise your hand if you're intending implementing > XEP-0289, > I don't think so, but looking at it, I haven't evaluated the requirements yet for a future use case I need to support: - A collection of laptops gets close to each other (WiFi, Bluetooth) - They all automatically join the same MUC It might be a peer-to-peer mechanism, or one might run a temporary XMPP server (thus becoming the master). Now, if XEP-0289 is not needed for that, then it's not applicable to my situation.
