Hello Peter

I'll send you a proposal in a few days.



This was my addition to the discussion, pretty much exactly a year ago (in 3 
days it seems):

http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2012-March/006717.html



A call to other members interested in EXI: Please let me know, so we can have a 
constructive discussion about the implementation of EXI. It will be vital for 
sensor networks, but might be of interest for others as well.



Sincerely,

Peter Waher







-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 11 mars 2013 19:37
To: Peter Waher
Cc: XMPP Standards; Yusuke DOI
Subject: Re: [Standards] Question on valid XMPP



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1



[ going back to interleaved comments - top-posting is evil ]



On 3/11/13 7:26 PM, Peter Waher wrote:

> Hello Peter

>

> Thanks for the links. We are aware of those attempts, and the IEEE

> working group had also unearthed them.

>

> However, the proposed solution is not sufficient.



That was as far as we got in 2008.



> For EXI to be successfully implemented, there needs to be a handshake

> where both parties agrees on a set of parameters and a set of schemas

> to use.



That might lead in the direction of using a separate port with a different SRV 
record.



> Also, an interchange of schemas between parties would be very good, so

> introduction of new schemas could be done without having to update

> software. Even though EXI can work in a schema-less mode, it's

> compression ability is best when both parties have access to the same

> XML schema.



Yes. We don't have a way to do that now, but we'd need it in this case.



> I've on my list to create such a proposal and mail to this list.



Great, I'm looking forward to it!



Peter



- --

Peter Saint-Andre

https://stpeter.im/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)

Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/



iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRPmqxAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pSvIP/1g+jsXVSTZlO5WsjOuNlPhJ

hAZXkpvNac5VfW7exPzKLoiXlBAnQ/8QfShmzQX1M/Xuye+J/WeT507JNZADcTaJ

OL57izNLyFnDdL50f+2OiwUgnvcfxkOK29Cjrj+CMwF5tMf4MdnOqtAEDgr1Fjqy

LIC8aMb5x+1RdepCN9sMpFqNPQYNyRkZ4CAIQNn7LbAtg95/9u/j7GexEg8gZEFI

QQ3Cagz+//jkdaHGOJX/0flEmraM42pwUiqoEpoVP7TJ6IBN+OZdzjzK9DfKo6JI

PQGDwHPrPe3gVqeDFxyuiNRjgZ7xRbpV4n4/we8+rcmpyklwYRBgMzE3leT+zwGj

SeV67lHc1Qg0o1kQi4RUQxznvujVuqhJMPgek9ksNWB7GgwkG5ZMkfg4aXx3HV6B

TKW01HNt9vurDQEaEvuR/YUN23fbQxbkHYbSti0u8hfLsOCZ9nKm7l5S/tTJK10n

XjoHQUSA6i+1IwaXXEpYopxcsu88nRbPq3cqt4rcGzT7X+l2AUwSEVQ4kHo7erW9

x9RayNgSqi3ZU17gxUe3ECW93YS5XpE3KjhP7outzYSMgd20q+qRagZbT2c6oCq0

O7kaMPPAzJQ/fa0dtutZsBNG6vkmv6xEqTAqJytqxuDKpBPt4kQ6RZxC8yzndV31

HW3MsA85M/eiAp1b2ua2

=8owV

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to