Hello John,

Thanks for your mail. It sounds like very interesting projects you're working 
with. I would be happy to hear your thoughts, ideas, visions and comments 
regarding this. I'll also make sure I include you in any discussions regarding 
EXI.

Sincerely,
Peter Waher

From: John Schneider [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 14 mars 2013 19:51
To: Peter Waher; FABLET Youenn; [email protected]
Cc: Joachim Lindborg ([email protected]); Yusuke DOI; Peter Saint-Andre; 
XMPP Standards; [email protected]; Stephen Williams
Subject: Re: Proposal for including EXI in XMPP

Peter,

Its really great to see some momentum on this! Thanks very much for the energy 
you are putting into it. This is something in which I've had a long-running 
interest. In fact, I think Peter and I first talked about it back in 2005 
(yikes!). Although I'm not sure Peter was completely sold on the idea at the 
time (broccoli ice cream anyone? [1]), he was gracious enough to help us get 
the XMPP EXI use case together [2] and even started an early draft [3]. Thanks 
Peter! ;-)

Here at work, we have incorporated EXI into various XMPP solutions to support 
our Efficient XML users (e.g., to enable XMPP on aircraft). So, I'm very 
interested in following your progress. Please keep me in the loop as you move 
forward. I'd be very happy to help if I can.

                      All the best!,

                      John


                      AgileDelta, Inc.

                      
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

                      http://www.agiledelta.com


[1] http://pooh-99hi.blogspot.com/2005/11/peter-saint-andre-broccoliafter.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-use-cases/#xmpp
[3] 
file:///jcs/Work/Standards/XMPP/xep-0000-Exi.html<file:///\\jcs\Work\Standards\XMPP\xep-0000-Exi.html>



From: Peter Waher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:38 AM
To: FABLET Youenn 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Joachim Lindborg 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Yusuke DOI 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Peter Saint-Andre 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, XMPP Standards 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Stephen Williams 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: Proposal for including EXI in XMPP
Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:39:02 +0000

Dear Youenn,

Thank you for your response.

We also think EXI is exceptionally interesting and want to use it for other 
technologies as well. For instance, we are also looking at EXI compression in 
REST web services, especially for use with mobile devices hoping to improve 
latency by decreasing packet sizes.

Regarding using the preexisting EXI option header, I was also thinking the same 
thing in the beginning, but changed my mind thinking there are options that are 
not readily applicable in the XMPP case (for instance the Document/Fragment 
option), as well as options that are necessary in the EXI/XMPP case that are 
not applicable and available in the more general EXI case, such as the 
sessionWideBuffers option, added in revision 0.0.2. (I've attached the latest 
revision, with a note regarding this option ยง3.2).

Thank you for your time, and looking forward to your comments,
Sincerely,
Peter Waher


From: FABLET Youenn [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 14 mars 2013 11:00
To: Peter Waher; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Joachim Lindborg ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)
Subject: RE: Proposal for including EXI in XMPP

Hi,

That is an interesting piece of work.
My first thought when going through it is that EXI option negotiation may be a 
feature that is useful to more than XMPP.
That is very good that you bring it to the table.

Reading the spec quickly, I wonder whether the already-defined EXI header 
option element could be used for that purpose, especially in the case it can be 
serialized as EXI.

Anyway, I think the EXI WG will review this and get back to you.
Regards,
                Youenn

From: Peter Waher [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: mercredi 13 mars 2013 17:43
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Joachim Lindborg ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)
Subject: Proposal for including EXI in XMPP

Hello

We have made a first draft of a proposal for incorporating EXI into XMPP 
networks. (See attached files.)

Anybody with an interest in EXI & XMPP are welcome to join us in this effort, 
please contact us. Any comments, suggestions, etc., on the contents of these 
documents are warmly welcomed and appreciated.

Sincerely,
Peter Waher

Reply via email to