-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A quick comment on one point. I'm in a meeting so I have only a few
moments... :-)

On 3/20/13 3:18 PM, Peter Waher wrote:

> *         Many seem to think that a pure binary binding seems the 
> correct path to go:
> 
> 
> 
> I've heard this from many people. And it's true that in some cases
> it might be easier to do this (at least for developers). However,
> it misses one of the main reasons why the XEP-0138 path was chosen:
> To allow for installation in any IT environment where XMPP is
> allowed, you need to go through port 5222. This is an accepted port
> number, it's accepted by IT departments, existing firewalls, etc.
> So, to be able to create applications that will be accepted by any
> IT department (accepting XMPP) and existing infrastructure
> (accepting XMPP), it has to go through this port, and
> consequentially, adapt itself to the requirements imposed by the
> XMPP core specification.
> 
> 
> 
> That being said, I'm all in favor for a parallel proposal being 
> worked out, using a binary-only port. Once a port number has been 
> assigned, and IETF has standardized its use, it will be a serious 
> option. (Otherwise, the solution will be seen as just another 
> proprietary protocol not based on standards - even though some
> parts are.) But before the IETF has agreed and proposed a standard 
> regarding this, it will have to be a secondary option.

That makes sense. I can see why we might want to modify a standard
XMPP stream to an EXI-compressed stream (although I don't think that
re-using port 5222 is the best reason to do so). I also do think that
we might want a "pure", binary-only transport binding on a separate
port. BTW, to be clear, we don't need an IETF-approved proposed
standard RFC to get a port assigned (see RFC 6335).

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=m+Zk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to