It's reliant on multiple resource binding, which we got scared of and ran away from. Rightly, in my opinion. On 16 Apr 2013 23:49, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/10/13 5:44 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Tobias Markmann wrote: > >> Hi, > >> when starting a impromptu chat with a couple other people you have > >> quite a special scenario. A auto generated name for the room, usually > >> the room is supposed to vanish (including history) as soon as all > >> people left. > >> > >> So i'd be great if room invites would carry an extra tag to identify > >> it as impromptu invite, so that it can be automatically accepted if > >> it comes from users on your roster. In addition to that a dedicated > >> dialog could be displayed that describes the issue in more > >> detail, for external invites. > >> > >> Any thoughts? > > > > How about hosting that MUC on your own JID... PMUC. Solves the issue > > of ugly autogenerated names, replaces it with one where you have to > > care about collisions between the participant nicknames and your own > > resources. > As in http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/private-muc.html > > I can't recall why that was never published as a XEP. > > Peter > >
