On 5/9/13 10:50 AM, Lance Stout wrote: >> Text that mandates this is currently in the 6122bis draft >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis#section-3>. >> I think it would be better to reference that and make sure the text >> there is sensible. > > +1. > > The only reason I added that sentence in this draft is because 6122bis > is itself still just a draft and not technically in effect. If we're ok > with temporarily referencing a bis draft (which it says is > inappropriate), then I'll add it in.
If y'all would provide more reviews of 6122bis we could push it forward. ;-) I'm working on some Python code to test it out, too (or at least generate the codepoint tables so we can do some sanity checking). Peter
