On 18 May 2013 14:33, Kim Alvefur <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 18 May 2013, 14:23:43 CEST, Spencer MacDonald > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Also you may say something that is "confidential" that you might want to >> remove after the recipient has acknowledged it. > > You really want to use some end-to-end encryption for that. > > Carbons (XEP-280) has a method for excluding single messages from processing. > That could be used to signal a wish for having a message excluded from > archiving, possibly broken out into a XEP of its own.
+1, I like that approach (partly because it doesn't necessarily need adding to XEP-0313, yay!). XEP-0136's controls for this were quite complicated, but a simple tag that disables carbons, archiving and perhaps other kinds of server processing would be quite welcome. > Or maybe security-labels. Now you go and ruin it... :) Regards, Matthew
