On May 22, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Spencer MacDonald <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Lance, > > OK so the xmlns element should be a parent not a sibling. > > Yes, the extension using stanza forward is supposed to contain it. This is a SHOULD in XEP-0297 (hrm, I wonder if this ought to be a MUST?)...now (-: - m&m Matthew A. Miller < http://goo.gl/LK55L > > On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 20:37, Lance Stout wrote: > >> On May 22, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Spencer MacDonald >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Maybe there is a good reason for it, but in XEP-0280 Message Carbons the >>> forwarded stanza is nested in either a received or sent element with the >>> carbons xmlns. >>> >>> In XEP-0313 Message Archive Management the result element with the mam >>> xmlns is a sibling of the forwarded stanza. >>> >>> Should there be a standard for this in terms of wether the xmlns element >>> should be the parent or sibling of the forwarded stanza? >> >> This is just because MAM hasn't been updated to match yet. See >> http://matthewwild.co.uk/uploads/xep-0313.html >> >> >> -- Lance >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
