On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 5/23/13 1:55 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > > The timing's now reached the perfect level of irony, I think. > > It's not clear to me that the XSF can legitimately publish other > people's extensions, or that third parties can submit other people's > extensions. I'm all for documentation, but we might not be able to do > that in the XEP series. > > It's not clear to me why not. We certainly couldn't if this were lifting text from someone else's documentation - it's not - it's merely documenting an XMPP extension, and as far as I'm aware there is no restriction on our doing so - it's purely a copyright issue. Dave.
