-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/30/12 12:34 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote: > Hi, > > I've started implementing XEP-0256 however its usage of XEP-0012 > is quite unfortunate. XEP-0012 provides relative timestamps. This > timestamp is added by the client to its presence message, not > including network delays and server processing delays. When you > receive such enriched presence your only option is to use the > current time to roughly tell when the absolute time which is quite > complex, which could be avoided. > > Thus I propose the option of adding an absolute timestamp instead > of the relative one to XEP-0256. Obviously this relies on > synchronized clocks to provide ideal usability but all major > desktop OS are shipped with network clock synchronization enabled > as far as i know. > > Does anyone object to this idea or have a different opinion on how > to solve this issue?
Seems like a fine approach. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRuUN3AAoJEOoGpJErxa2p9aoP/1pXy3gcQ3b4gRv8pIUssjV/ nQdFEZJ3JiY/ADzj7Z2WRS36NR4Hq5YeZrRXgkTjTeh2C0DItg0MbVy5zBv3Yohf znLI7cIEH0Eq7hA9zAlFVeUpqB393obFrG6YlJ6H0BPal20gu3mLGnG59bVbyAfr 9GFUs+GFQ+b6q/etXdzg/tqwXw/M36xdCHzVzm3fDyiNeEYBKK2EnTA5h3uTuqnZ FySaG1jQBP1djuW4Sl3yBLZD6dfbQZEr/uIwmTFHpmjXPJIaOswgiRvpU64nEzMY +PF4FtNo22vhh/58ejaZVhUHc5Lqsj9tf9+nCkwXMjvMPTSL3YxHAt3BDTYQI+zX cuXF775IQXv6a3fiP67G76Jwuab8Mhx1Qq6Dzqk3ZPfXr4Qi6Ipz284ycCMgupCW xVsep6t+uxKi6tVRebdFiwRL2jXyNE04tf4yUCpUL1r5acPn5eMq96eHzAAtOoU1 R5zdW9NEfslsKGmSAJiXbgU1zA0iAKwKsUQYQTvJhTeggTXD4cO+2DVaL8LY+12a oAzHKK4/hKG86HTuAW6JUwUOyq1X+5nvkujcpsIT0EtoGkxsOAHXOqrK9RIyNVLC pdTlU8n+2+9AGSELGrHSEa9UBf65BAE/V/FPr/j+CVpdc1qPpqJEiq3XT6J4fexN 6EE9nDbXQN15TocsMuiO =18XI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
