On 20 June 2013 09:23, Spencer MacDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > I would personally be happy with either solution, but if we keep the no body > rule for backwards compatibility, wouldn't we require "positive" message > processing hints too, for when we want to archive a message with no body? > i.e. allow-permanent-storage, allow-storage, allow-copy
Yes, if we kept the rule then I would add such hints. However as I noted in my message, I think I'd rather remove it. And there isn't really anything to keep backwards compatibility with. Regards, Matthew
