-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/2/13 11:46 AM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 4.2.2 - I'm aware than we've had debates in the past about how > much needs to be MTI. As things currently stand, the XEP is fairly > clear and straightforward, and I wonder if making all of these MTI > would be > > > MTI?
MTI = "Mandatory to Implement" I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I think Kev might be wondering why guidelines that seem implementation-specific are mandated in the specification, since it could be argued that they are not critical from a protocol perspective and relate more to user experience than to network communication. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR0xu9AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pFloQAIQzQ83vaDov7lyhn33dWkmx G60I+YsndpRBY87j0zdOSoRxK4TiUea5+JtAeptuo97gTlL4NqM78qtmUf9PDvGj hCL8VQ4Odsy7iBw1vd2rwTgBeCWRK+VES+d+0QZ2+EOyT+schQv+YITaDbKsEoNf zUHWOILRaOrUIc9OJ6prIoQBmKw8WqKBDn8PmKmGBlnWrMBr6kpGMICSCheBrnlN rL0OpY4kZDMtXySsqYbSK9kAAD1RdmOMtpRNme5Mh/gSlbiBUllFhDu1oZ7tPElO Os5vj6kSvhAjg4nkgERDN/XnYUb8uZTC0avTD4LrEAB/iaguidwhJJ6MdE4rdvhF gOAzTMDiGCWG6GiOrxnzouVfoAv0uTmhiV2ZkKGbl9ADtFC3fpUPWeTCnGU1tFVr BBHMdNNnkmU/O9Iyus03MLmtlJ0YReD59vInQxhcJdhLb4Vmo2f52pUaLQbOfbZO c5Zu8W+uPtNm7Go/uELpEgvgZOIToBqMacvK1Wym4XRAoDKBdtqiwYxcr6JXRqf/ V58L4CQ1qXH7I4JvQlZh4A4tgtMqJ6d0KmA0TrDuDb8x0v/83CXHz0SbQfYxWDV2 VZOBlo6hG6gMf9paQtHSMU1MgYRyJjL9r/THdb7NMp8xSVkVV9skybHDI6918yNg 9yEaJC5Y5H6Sp9lAY16E =5xTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
