These are similar issues to what I have been seeing, XEP-0084 seems like a good solution for me regardless of wether I can have images of multiple sizes.
Spencer On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Simon Tennant <[email protected]>wrote: > I read in the spec that: > > *It is intended that this specification will supersede both IQ-Based > Avatars <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0008.html> > [6<http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0084.html#nt-id208472>] > and vCard-Based Avatars <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0153.html> > [7<http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0084.html#nt-id208494>] > once the PEP subset of XMPP publish-subscribe is implemented and deployed > widely enough.* > > One of the reasons I never turn on vCard support for servers is that it > opens up a can of worms - > > - a user fills out their vCard or edits their Avatar and drags over a > photo of themselves that is 7MB. > - another user's phone client is now stuck trying to download a huge image > - likewise, as a server admin I can't set an upper bound on the image size. > > S. > > > On 24 July 2013 11:16, Spencer MacDonald < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if it is "allowed" to have multiple sized images (width >> and height) in a single node? e.g. a thumbnail and full scale image. >> >> Section 5 of the XEP specifies that you can have different formats, but I >> want to have the same format but at different sizes. >> >> Regards >> >> Spencer >> > > > > -- > Simon Tennant | buddycloud.com | +49 17 8545 0880 | office hours: > goo.gl/tQgxP >
