On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Todd Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
> · **Send the message to the resource with the highest priority > This is legal behaviour, as Matthew says. If it's of type normal or chat, anyway. > ** > > **· **Send the stanza to all resources > This, too, is legal behaviour - though more commonly, all resources without a negative priority. Personally I'm less keen on this, but not hugely so - if the sender wants this behaviour, though, then can use type headline, which does this. > **** > > **· **Drop the message and return an error (forcing direct > interactions with resources only) > This would be a Bad Thing, and isn't allowable under RFC 6121. > **** > > ** ** > > Any input would be greatly appreciated.**** > I noticed you cited RFC 6120. That's a fine spec, and many of my best friends are RFC 6120s, however I suspect you want to read through RFC 6121 §8.5.2, and in particular §8.5.2.1.1, which explains what to do if a <message/> stanza is received to a bare jid when one or more non-negative priority resources is online (which, I think, is more or less what you're asking). Dave.
