Hi Peter,
I'm working on a mobile IM based on XMPP, I'd like to be there when you
start. Please include me in your list.

Thanks

Daniele
On 30 Oct 2013 14:44, "Peter Waher" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hello Mark & Dave.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for the info. I’ve added it to the list of ideas to study before we
> produce the proposal for battery sensors.****
>
> ** **
>
> As you say, there are various things you might need to think about when it
> comes to battery powered devices. Bandwidth, packet size, memory, cpu (CPU
> drains battery), etc. The most important is battery life time. Many sensors
> might have work for up to 10 years without replacing battery. For this to
> work you also need to take sleeping into account, and how systems interact
> with devices that are only intermittently (albeit regularly) connected to
> the network, etc. Then of course, there’s the problem of bandwidth
> throttling. If a device is in a low power mode (which is a higher state
> than sleep mode), how can you make sure you can still send important
> messages to it?****
>
> ** **
>
> Anybody interested in these questions, please let me know, and I’ll
> include you when the time comes to start working on the extensions. (People
> who have already expressed their interest are already added to the list.)*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards,****
>
> Peter Waher****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Dave Cridland [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* den 29 oktober 2013 17:23
> *To:* XMPP Standards
> *Subject:* Re: [Standards] Standard for Throttling/Queueing Stanzas****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Mark Rejhon <[email protected]> wrote:**
> **
>
>   You might want to peek at:****
>
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0286.html****
>
> It's deferred, but it also pertains to efficiency for battery powered
> devices.  ****
>
> Most of what it says also applies to battery powered sensor, with a few
> modifications.****
>
>  ** **
>
> Mostly it concerns itself with power drain due to 3G radio levels.****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd imagine that for sensor devices, the memory/bandwidth tradeoffs may be
> different for compression, for example.****
>

Reply via email to