On 12/13/2014 07:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > What do you think is not covered in the security considerations section of > RFC 4422, in particular section 6.1.2?
You're exactly right of course. Thanks; that's exactly what I was looking for. Knew I must be missing something. Looks like it's covered afterall. Thanks, Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
