2015-01-22 1:53 GMT+01:00 Holger Weiß <[email protected]>:

> * Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> [2015-01-22 01:11]:
> > right now a client when querying the MAM archive has to relay upon the
> fact
> > that server time and client time are the same (which they never are) or
> > that all received messages have a proper message id (which they never
> do).
> > If both these mechanism fail the client has no chance of avoiding
> duplicate
> > messages.
>
> As the issue of duplicate messages isn't specific to MAM, maybe it would
> make sense to have a separate XEP that tells servers to add some child
> element with a proper UUID to message stanzas?
>

That would actually be a good idea. Other use case would be MUC history or
when getting the offline storage and MAM at the same time. (Or MUC history
and MAM history for that MUC)

cheers
Daniel

Reply via email to