Ta. On 10 Jan 2015, at 18:33, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > XEP-313 reuses XEP-4 Data Forms The data forms schema marks the 'type' > attribute required.
All fixed. > XEP-313 § 4 states that "The final <message/> response MUST include an > RSM <set/> element indicating the UID of the first and last message of > the (possibly limited) result set." Does this mean that every <fin/> > extension must come with a RSM element included? I hope this is the > case, but if so, please adjust example 1 where a <fin/> is shown without > RSM (all other examples in the XEP where <fin/> appears have a RSM element). Should go away once we’re using iq results again. > Also consider stating that the message with the <fin/> element SHOULD > NOT (?) contain a <forwarded/> element. Similarly. > In example 3, the FORM_TYPE field has no required 'hidden' type attribute. Fixed. > And where is the schema for XEP-313? > http://xmpp.org/schemas/archive-management.xsd returns an empty page. :( We tend to do schemas when stuff gets pushed to Draft. So that bit of fun is still ahead of us. /K
