On 21/01/2015 16:38, Kevin Smith wrote:
It is, but I don’t think privcomp mentions this requirement at all.*
It is not a requirement, because privileged entities can be used for other things than an external PEP service. In addition it was written before namespace delegation, I can add a note which link to it, but it is not a dependency.
If it claims to be allowing you to implement PEP services, it surely needs to reference how to use the bits together to do so? Otherwise stupid people (of whom I’m certainly not one) might read this in isolation and wonder what’s going on (which I absolutely didn’t).
I'll add a note about this, but the 2 (proto)XEP can be used independently. Namespace Delegation has a note mentionning privileged entity in "Introduction".
(I’m not blocking on this, BTW)
I'm not sure about this sentence: you aren't blocking at all or you are blocking on something else ? Because I see no mention of privileged entity in last council minutes, and the protoXEP is still not experimental. So if its blocked, what is still the source of problems ? There are a couple of thing mentionned in last message that I'll change on next revision, but I don't see any major issue.
/K
Cheers Goffi
