Hi Johannes, On 27 Feb 2015, at 08:28, Hund, Johannes <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it make sense to give some guideline/convention on how to design the > schema, e.g. to name the payload child of an IQ, when to use a different > namespace etc.?
It might. > It could potentially make things more uniform, thus additionally allowing > helper functions in implementations and increase reuse? I think that we’ve got a decade and a half of prototol that won’t comply with whatever guidelines we come up with, so I’m not sure how much it would help implementations, though, which would still have to look at both the element name and namespace to determine what the purpose is. /K
