Thanks Christian, I think I'll go with matching the type from the original message.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Christian Schudt <[email protected]> wrote: > I have interpreted and implemented it as „normal", too. > > I have also suggested it to be more clear a year ago here, but unfortunately > nobody cared: > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2014-January/028479.html > > - Christian > > Am 28.02.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Daniele Ricci <[email protected]>: > >> Thanks Kurt, >> I can see that smack implementation puts normal. I can't look at other >> libraries right now, I'll check tomorrow. Anyway I also would like to hear >> the opinion of the people here. >> >> Daniele >> >> On 28 Feb 2015 14:02, "Kurt Zeilenga" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Feb 28, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Daniele Ricci <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hello people, >> > I'm reading XEP-0184 and I can't find any indication of what I should >> > put into the type attribute of delivery receipt stanzas (that is, with >> > <received/> inside). Should I leave it empty (defaulting to "normal") >> > or should I use the type of the original message? >> >> At least in the groupchat case, you must match the message type. It’s not >> clear to me whether generally matching the type is generally best. >> >> — Kurt > -- Daniele
