FYI > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Kevin Smith > Date: 5 March 2015 14:03:17 GMT > To: XMPP Council > Subject: [Council] Minutes 2015-03-05 > Reply-To: XMPP Council > > Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2015-03-04/ > > 1) Roll call > Dave, Kev, Lance, Philip present. Matt late. > > 2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/push.html > Accept as Experimental? > > Dave, Lance, Fippo +1. Kev and Matt to vote on-list. > > 3) Moving XEPs to final > > Short discussion about whether Council has to approve calls for experience. > We don’t, the Editor chooses (although it’s a good idea to at least chat with > Council first). > > (Matt enters here) > > 4) Council Questionnaire results > > We discussed the results of the questionnaire that went to the membership > about Council. > > (Scribe notes: This was somewhat hard to extract, read the room logs for more > information) > > * "Does the description provided about the 'Purpose' of the Council fit > with what you understood Council to do?” > > Most people said their understanding of Council matched the description > given, while 25% said they thought Council did more. General agreement to try > to do more (with the more discussed later) > > * "Do you read the minutes of Council meetings” > > There didn’t seem to be work to do here. > > * Encouraging authors to attend Council when their documents are discussed. > > Membership unanimously thought this was useful, so we’ll try to remember to > start doing this more reliably. > > * What does ‘technical leadership’ mean? > > No responses caused particular discussion or suggested needed actions > > * Should Council assign new authors for neglected XEPs? > > Membership almost unanimously answered ‘yes’, so we’ll start trying to look > at this. > > * Should Council encourage specifications in needed areas? > > The response here was generally ‘yes’. Action for Council to think about ways > of addressing this, for discussion next meeting. > > * Should Council encourage implementation? > > There was a narrow majority saying ‘yes’ here. In light of other (more > unanimously wanted) additional work we’re taking on in response to the > questionnaire, we’re going to leave this for the time being. > > * Should Council be responsible for authoring XEPs? > > The membership said no. > > * Do people know how to find out how to submit XEPs? > > We thought too many people said ‘no’, so action for Council to think about > ways to address this, and discuss next meeting. > > 5) Date of next meeting > > 2015-03-11 16:00Z > > 6) Any other business > > Peter requested feedback on IETF work - > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-March/029656.html > > Fini
