On 20.04.2015 13:43, Georg Lukas wrote: > * Georg Lukas <[email protected]> [2015-04-18 11:42]: >> I really dislike (ab)using carbons as a MAM pseudo-subscription. > > Another case in point: Carbons are not reflected to the sender, so if > you send a message, you have no way (yet) to know its archive ID.
Right, I also think that it's sensible to replace carbons with MAM subscriptions in the long term. > b) determine the message's archive ID for matching it with the next MAM > query. FYI, I'm currently working on a XEP for message IDs (XEP-MID): http://geekplace.eu/xeps/xep-mid/xep-mid.html While this is intended to be used with MAM, in order to assign every message a unique and stable ID, it is not withing the scope of XEP-MID how entities become aware of the ID(s) of their send/outgoing messages. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
