The discussion drifted a bit into whether non-stanza top-level stream elements should be used for a particular use case/XEP or not. But what I really wanted to discuss is whether they could be used after resource binding in general, or if this should be disallowed. That's why I asked the council members to express their opinion on this in their next meeting.
As side note: I still think it is advantageous to have a unambiguous term defined for non-stanza top-level stream elements. It would clearly distinguish stanzas from non-stanzas in specifications and may help to avoid the case where specification authors erroneously refer to non-stanzas as stanzas. See for example the EXI XEP (XEP-322) where this is done (nearly?) everywhere. Not to mention that this may cause confusion when we take XEP-198: Stream Management into consideration. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
