FYI.

I'll discuss this with the protoXEP author; I suspect he'll be quite
understanding.

Dave.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dave Cridland <[email protected]>
Date: 22 April 2015 at 17:42
Subject: Veto against namespaces protoXEP
To: XMPP Council <[email protected]>


There is some possibility that XEP-0001 might be interpreted such that my
protoXEP would go through by default; for the avoidance of doubt I'm
therefore placing a veto on this until (at least) the next Council meeting.

Dave.

Reply via email to