> On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > > Two years ago I agreed with you entirely. I maintained this position until I > switched to a server and set of clients that supported it, and then found it > actually works pretty well. I know there's potential theoretical holes, but i > suspect those are more plugged than not with 198 and MAM. >
So, the quality standard we are aiming for is pretty well, with the holes plugged by other XEPs :-) Since you always have to fall back to MAM in the multi-client case why not just use MAM always? ck
