On 18 Jun 2015, at 14:47, Sam Whited <[email protected]> wrote: > To keep the other thread on topic, I've split this off. I'd love to > formally put the advancement of carbons on the agenda. Thoughts from > the community/council?
My thoughts are that one of two things needs to happen. Either Carbons needs to be updated to ‘play nicely’ with MAM (the general preference of the Summit this year) or a new MAMSub spec needs to be written to replace Carbons where MAM is in use (the general preference of a few people not at the summit, and a couple who were, I think). It seems premature to advance Carbons until we have a clear path forward on this. /K
