On 28 July 2015 at 08:22, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27.07.2015 23:29, Sam Whited wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to propose that the Council vote to move XEP-0452: Client > > State Indication into last call (the "Proposed State"), and then > > hopefully into draft afterwards. > > > > The XEP has been sitting dormant since it was last updated almost a > > year ago (2014-08-28). > > I've talked to Matt at the Summit this year about a message notification > send by the server to the client indicating a successful CSI state > change. We agreed on the change and I sent a patch to Matt a while ago. > But the patch was not applied since then. I've created a PR now: > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/34 > > What? Why? What can a client do in response to the information? What would it not do without it?
Also, why wrap the server notification in a message, and do I assume that the use of two namespace versions is in error? > That said: I don't think that CSI has sufficient adoption at the moment > to move to draft. > > - Florian > >
