On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Philipp Hancke <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2015-07-30 11:07 GMT+02:00 Goffi <[email protected]>: >> On 30/07/2015 02:29, Sam Whited wrote: >> HTTP give no advantage over Socks5, and doesn't do NAT traversal as >> Jingle can do, and it's an other whole different server to maintain. >>
For the record, my name is a copy/paste error or typo in the quoted message there: I did not write that statement. Goffi did :) My position is that we should adopt HTTP File Upload with the provision that it add support for specifying headers that the client should send back, and possibly an IQ to fetch the GET URL later to support file upload systems where the final file name is not known up front (though this is less of a priority for me). —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com
