On August 12, 2015 5:31:25 PM GMT+02:00, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: >On 12 Aug 2015, at 16:14, Ralph Meijer <ral...@ik.nu> wrote: >> >> On August 12, 2015 4:50:18 PM GMT+02:00, Kevin Smith ><kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: >>> On 12 Aug 2015, at 15:44, Ralph Meijer <ral...@ik.nu> wrote: >>>> >>>> On August 12, 2015 3:07:44 PM GMT+02:00, Kevin Smith >>> <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: > [..] > >> We've seen a lot of hinting at improvements, and I do remember your >own suggestions, but I wonder if we couldn't do that in a new spec >instead. When have we waited long enough to decide this is the best we >can do for now? > >Well, that was the proposal I made earlier this year, and there was >wide agreement that a new spec was the wrong approach, and waiting for >Carbons was right. I’ve even convinced myself at this point that >waiting for Carbons is probably right.
I don't recall if I was against a competing spec back at the summit, but generally believe competing Experimental XEPs are a good thing. Even if yours isn't adopted, at least we have an easier-to-find record of it. Digging through a heap of mails and chat logs is a lot easier with a XEP number. >Dave - do you have an ETA on the pubsub/Account stuff? I think that >might help matters significantly. Agreed, although I still believe that stuff is much further in the future as a thing to build on. -- ralphm
