On 29.09.2015 22:44, Mark Rejhon wrote: > There is this pending cosmetic errata, that we wish to confirm with > XSF members: > > Christian Schudt (of Babbler) says of XEP-0301: > >>2. The XML Schema might be wrong, but I am not sure. >> >> <xs:sequence> >> <xs:element ref='t' minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'/> >> <xs:element ref='e' minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'/> >> <xs:element ref='w' minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'/> >> </xs:sequence> >> >> I think this schema suggests elements to be in this exact sequence, e.g. >> <t/><t/><t/><e/><e/><w/> >> >> I think a <xs:choice> is missing somewhere, something like: >> >> <xs:sequence> >> <xs:choice minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'> >> <xs:element ref='t'/> >> <xs:element ref='e'/> >> <xs:element ref='w'/> >> </xs:choice> >> </xs:sequence> >> >> But I am not sure about it. > > If we fix the schema, would this force namespace to increment: > i.e. urn:xmpp:rtt:1 instead of urn:xmpp:rtt:0
The schema is considered not normative, therefore this would not require a namespace version bump. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
