* Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> [2015-09-30 14:37]: > On 30.09.2015 10:47, Holger Weiß wrote: > > * Christian Schudt <[email protected]> [2015-09-30 10:38]: > >> XEP-0016 is complex, but powerful. I see no reason to deprecate it, just > >> because there's a similar XEP (0191). > > > > That's not the reasoning. The reasoning is that they aren't compatible. > > What about XEP-191 § 5?
This doesn't solve the issue: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2014-December/029430.html The problem is that it's unclear (to me) how to map XEP-0016 rules that block some kinds of stanzas but not others. Holger
