On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I think there might be merit in changing these from “Conformance Suites” to > something along the lines of “2015 Best Practices”. I think that leaves us > more free to include things that are best practice but not widely deployed > (e.g. Client State Indications) that otherwise we’d have to argue about > whether it’s reasonable to label something “non-conformant” because it > doesn’t implement them, or whether it’s reasonable to include Experimental > specs, while satisfying the main purpose for these suites of indicating which > XEPs people should be implementing right now.
I like that idea too; makes me feel less weird about including the "experimental" features which I none-the-less feel are essential, or are widely deployed. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com
