Hi Dave According to your reply, if I want to see presences of all contacts in search result, I have to add them to roster. That is just fine for single endpoint; however, jabber supports multiple endpoints (the same users can login on multiple devices) if I do this on one endpoint, all other endpoints will see searched contacts in the contact list which is weird behavior. I am not sure XMPP has a workaround for this issue. Thanks for your response Dave.
Thanks, Phuong Vo > On Oct 17, 2015, at 5:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Send Standards mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Standards digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Fwd: [Council] Minutes 20151014 (Kevin Smith) > 2. Presences of Contacts in Search Result (Phuong Vo) > 3. Re: Presences of Contacts in Search Result (Dave Cridland) > 4. Re: Fwd: [Council] Minutes 20151014 (Goffi) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:08:18 +0100 > From: Kevin Smith <[email protected]> > To: XMPP Standards <[email protected]> > Subject: [Standards] Fwd: [Council] Minutes 20151014 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > FYI > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Kevin Smith >> Date: 16 October 2015 at 15:06:51 BST >> To: XMPP Council >> Subject: [Council] Minutes 20151014 >> >> 1) Roll call >> Kev, Lance, Fippo, Dave present. Matt absent (it later transpired he?d tried >> to send apologies and failed) >> >> 2) Website review >> >> Dave asked everyone to review all the technical content on >> http://new.xmpp.org/ for correctness >> >> 3) Date of next meeting >> >> 20151021 15:00Z >> >> 4) Any other business >> >> Fippo asked if https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/108 satisfied Kev?s previous >> comment (it did). >> >> Kev reminded everyone about the upcoming elections. >> >> Fini > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20151016/c06ca407/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:14:12 -0700 > From: Phuong Vo <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Standards] Presences of Contacts in Search Result > Message-ID: > <CA+wHs=z-wo9tej9edcgvr7torkfdt1nsxcnaw5mefhc3yjh...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi, > > I am currently developing jabber client (vs Cisco Jabber server) and facing > a difficulty of getting presences of contacts (internal contacts, not > federated contacts) in search result if those contacts are not in my > contact list (not in roster). In term of XMPP protocol, could you please > help me how to achieve this feature? Any idea, direction are appreciated. > > Thanks, > Phuong Vo > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20151016/f262e3cb/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:07:32 +0100 > From: Dave Cridland <[email protected]> > To: XMPP Standards <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Standards] Presences of Contacts in Search Result > Message-ID: > <cakhuczypba2tojbrgmep5h65hvwcpmnrmg_rlsjhozc0025...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >> On 16 October 2015 at 18:14, Phuong Vo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am currently developing jabber client (vs Cisco Jabber server) and >> facing a difficulty of getting presences of contacts (internal contacts, >> not federated contacts) in search result if those contacts are not in my >> contact list (not in roster). In term of XMPP protocol, could you please >> help me how to achieve this feature? Any idea, direction are appreciated. > You can't, by design, in standard XMPP. > > The roster is not only a contact list, but also an access control list of > which other jids are allowed to see your presence; so to see people's > presence you'd need to add them to your roster. You do this by subscribing > to their presence via a <presence type='subscribe'/> stanza. > > Dave. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20151016/0614f8bf/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:55:50 +0200 > From: Goffi <[email protected]> > To: XMPP Standards <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Standards] Fwd: [Council] Minutes 20151014 > Message-ID: <1981379.Sl3HtCtIuH@dhcppc7> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Le vendredi 16 octobre 2015, 15:08:18 Kevin Smith a ?crit : >> FYI >> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> From: Kevin Smith >>> Date: 16 October 2015 at 15:06:51 BST >>> To: XMPP Council >>> Subject: [Council] Minutes 20151014 >>> >>> 1) Roll call >>> Kev, Lance, Fippo, Dave present. Matt absent (it later transpired he?d >>> tried to send apologies and failed) >>> >>> 2) Website review >>> >>> Dave asked everyone to review all the technical content on >>> http://new.xmpp.org/ for correctness > > The new website looks great, congrats ! I'm just wondering if "The most > secure > messaging protocol" and "Privacy-focused" is suitable when we still don't > have > a good popular solution for end to end encryption. I know there is work on > Axolotl/Omemo which fixes some stuff but: > 1) it's not standardised yet > 2) it seems to be focusing on chat > 3) it encodes the <body> element instead of the whole stanza > > We still lack a popular end to end full stanza encryption solution. > > Is it possible to have a focus on end 2 end encryption for the Fosdem XMPP > summit ? It's a long time issue in XMPP, and I don't think we can claim "the > most secure messaging protocol" without this fixed. > > > Thanks > Goffi > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Standards Digest, Vol 143, Issue 21 > ******************************************
