I think this looks good, though I think: - The SRV label form probably ought to follow the precedent set by RFC 6186, even though I think that's uglier. - I'm not at all convinced by abusing SNI in lieu of ALPN.
On 8 December 2015 at 17:39, XMPP Extensions Editor <[email protected]> wrote: > The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. > > Title: SRV records for XMPP over TLS > > Abstract: This specification defines a procedure to look up _tls SRV > records in addition to _tcp and mix weights/priorities. > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/tls-srv.html > > The XMPP Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this > proposal as an official XEP. > >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
