FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sam Whited <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:40 AM Subject: 2015-12-09 Meeting Minutes To: [email protected] # 2015-12-09 Council Meeting Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2015-12-09/#16:00:10 ## Roll call - Lance - Dave - PSA - Tobias - MattJ ## ProtoXEP Message Attaching: Accept as Experimental http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/attachto.html - +1 MattJ - +1 Lance - +1 psa - +1 Tobias - +1 Dave ## ProtoXEP Quality of Service: Accept as Experimental http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/qos.html - -1 Dave - -1 MattJ - -1 Lance - Tobias on list - PSA notes that ensuring exactly once delivery is hard - MattJ notes that MQTT does it, but is not federated ## ProtoXEP SRV records for XMPP over TLS: Accept as Experimental http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/tls-srv.html - +1 Dave - +1 Lance - +1 PSA - +1 Tobias - +1 MattJ - Lance notes that it's "in that awkward spot between XEP [and] RFC" - PSA notes that SASL and STARTTLS started as XEPs and then became RFCs ## ProtoXEP Multi-User Chat Light: Accept as Experimental http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/muc-light.html - MattJ on list - Tobias on list - PSA on list - Dave on list - Lance on list - Dave notes that it's a minimalist MUC implementation not based on PubSub that rejects presence entirely rather than making it optional (and is leaning towards -1) - Lance notes that it requires roster items for rooms to be in a particular group ## XEP-0138: Update to 2.1 https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/100 - +1 Tobias - +1 PSA - +1 MattJ (pending links and better explanation of chosen plaintext attacks) - Dave notes that not returning the original stanza in errors would probably do the same thing - Sam wonders if it should be worth withdrawing the PR and waiting on a more comprehensive review of 0138? - PSA notes that he's been saying that all along - MattJ agrees Action item: - Identify who is qualified to do a security audit of XEP-0138 ## Move XEP-0301 to Final - +1 Dave - PSA wonders if their are fixes on the way, Lance tables discussion until next week ## Date of next SBTSBC? - MattJ: nwwfm - Tobias: wfm Aside: Note taker is confused and doesn't know what any of this means. ## AOB None -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
