It looks like my email composer lost some text. Corrected:

In XEP–0353: Jingle Message Initiation, section 3.4 Rejecting Intent to Start a 
Session we have:

Instead of accepting the call, the responder might want to ignore the call and 
tell all of her devices to stop ringing (e.g., perhaps because Romeo is getting 
to be a bit of a nuisance). She does this by rejecting the call on one of her 
devices and having that device tell all of the other devices to stop ringing, 
in the form of a message to her own bare JID containing an <reject/> element 
specifying the session ID of the original <propose/> message.

This enables a user to silence an incoming call, but does not leave room for 
explicitly rejecting a call. I’d propose that a client MAY send a reject 
message in response to the propose.

So I’d propose making the following addition:

Next, the responder MAY want to decline the call explicitly, in the form of a 
message to the sender’s full JID containing a <reject/> element specifying the 
session ID of the original <propose/> message.

<message from='[email protected]/tablet'
         to='[email protected]/orchard'>
  <reject xmlns='urn:xmpp:jingle-message:0' id='a73sjjvkla37jfea'/>
</message>



Thanks,
Xander Dumaine


On April 27, 2016 at 3:43:54 PM, Dumaine, Xander 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:

Hello,

In XEP–0353: Jingle Message Initiation, section 3.4 Rejecting Intent to Start a 
Session we have:

Instead of accepting the call, the responder might want to ignore the call and 
tell all of her devices to stop ringing (e.g., perhaps because Romeo is getting 
to be a bit of a nuisance). She does this by rejecting the call on one of her 
devices and having that device tell all of the other devices to stop ringing, 
in the form of a message to her own bare JID containing an element specifying 
the session ID of the original message.

This enables a user to silence an incoming call, but does not leave room for 
explicitly rejecting a call. I’d propose that a client MAY send a reject 
message in response to the propose.

So I’d propose making the following addition:

Next, the responder MAY want to decline the call explicitly, in the form of a 
message to the sender’s full JID containing a element specifying the session ID 
of the original message.

<message from='[email protected]/tablet'
         to='[email protected]/orchard'>
  <reject xmlns='urn:xmpp:jingle-message:0' id='a73sjjvkla37jfea'/>
</message>




Thanks,
Xander Dumaine
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to