On 05.07.2016 10:08, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:55:53 +0200 > Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd also welcome if XEP development, especially for such an important >> one like MIX, would be more open. > > For the record, we already have github XSF repo for that. We can keep > development there and tag stable version.
So far, the XSF repo is *only* used for submitted XEPs, everything in inbox/ is a ProtoXEPs and XEPs with numbers follow the standards track. Changes are only made by the XSF Editor Team. It is not used for active development of those XEPs, and I think it should be that way. A while ago I suggested establishing an extra repo for incubating XEPs and updates to existing XEPs in xsf@. My vision was to make write access to that repo easily possible, to have it build via CI, and to publish it somewhere (e.g. xmpp.org/lab), with the hope that this will encourage collaboration, improve the quality of ProtoXEPs and kickstart experimental implementations. This idea was not received well for some reasons I frankly do not understand. We clearly need a place like that. XEP development behind closed doors is not desirable. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
