Hey Steve, thanks for keeping up with all our requests :)
* Steve Kille <[email protected]> [2016-09-02 18:06]: > > A consequence of this is that messages HAVE to go to the bare JID. > > > > I suggest that this very rationale and the related fundamental design > > decision > > of MIX should be put into the XEP. > > I have updated the requirements to reflect these points. While you are at it, please also clarify how PAM is supposed to help there. My initial (confused) reading of this was that messages are normally delivered according to RFC6121 rules, which causes them to land in offline storage, be carbonated or be received by non-MIX clients. It would be great to know how MIX is going to prevent this cataclysm. Georg -- || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
