> On 6 Sep 2016, at 09:00, Daurnimator <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6 September 2016 at 00:59, XMPP Extensions Editor <[email protected]> wrote: >> Version 0.3 of XEP-0369 (Mediated Information eXchange (MIX)) has been >> released. >> >> Abstract: This document defines Mediated Information eXchange (MIX), an XMPP >> protocol extension for the exchange of information among multiple users >> through a mediating service. The protocol can be used to provide human group >> communication and communication between non-human entities using channels, >> although with greater flexibility and extensibility than existing groupchat >> technologies such as Multi-User Chat (MUC). MIX uses Publish-Subscribe to >> provide flexible access and publication, and uses Message Archive Management >> (MAM) to provide storage and archiving. >> >> Changelog: Addressing comments from review of 0.2 and >> expansion/clarification of MUC/MIX dual working (sek) >> >> Diff: https://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0369/diff/0.2.3/vs/0.3 >> >> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0369.html > > Comments: > > Section 3: >> Each participant is addressable by a single bare JID, which is a proxy JID >> (not the user's real JID) to make it straightforward to hide the user's real >> JID from other channel participants. Full JIDs comprised of this bare JID >> plus a resource are then constructed, allowing visibility into the number of >> online resources participating in a channel. > > Are the resources of full jids masked too?
Yes. > Section 5.1.3: >> leaving the channel is a permanent action for a user across all clients, not >> just a matter of telling the channel that the user is not currently >> available or for a single client > > How can a user opt out of receiving messages on one of their (many) resources? We sort this out as part of the PAM story. > > Section 5.1.6: >> Unlike in Multi-User Chat (XEP-0045) [24] where coming online is a special >> action, coming online in MIX is implicit when presence status is set > > In MUC it didn't have to be; infact, often joining a room was no > different to updating your presence. In MUC it did have to be, because the join needed a special payload, and was sent as directed presence, not as broadcast. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
