* Kevin Smith <[email protected]> [2016-09-07 11:19]: > It’s not clear to me that another stanza is necessary, and that this > can’t come out of normal caps handling by the server. It’s probably > not the end of the world to have one, but I think I would be inclined > to start investigating things in terms of the traditional caps > mechanism, and then upgrade to a new stanza when we find it’s needed. > I’m relatively low-F on this (maybe 4ish).
I think the biggest problem with adding this to caps is privacy. You don't want your MIX whitelist/blacklist to leak to third parties, and it will be a significant amout of work on the server to rewrite all caps and presence stanzas from a client to filter that out. Georg -- || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
