* Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> [2016-10-29 12:51]: > The Stanza-ID XEP has a business rule explaining how stanza-ids are > cleaned. However as a client I have no way of knowing whether or not > the injecting entity did so. Verification can only happen via a disco > feature of the injecting entity. The only question is whether this > should happen with the namespace of the XEP that uses stanza-ids (MAM > in that case) or with the original stanza-id namespace. > My argument is to use the stanza-id namespace because using MAM would > require a namespace bump in MAM and namespace bumps are always tricky.
I agree this belongs into XEP-0359, not just for pragmatic reasons. XEP-0359 should be fully functional on its own, not only in the context of another XEP. Holger _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
