On 12/1/16 9:59 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 1 December 2016 at 16:29, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote:
Do folks here want to finish off the Invisible Command spec? It has been
"Proposed" for a long time:
I'd like it to survive, it's a good companion to XEP-0191. I don't
believe invisibility is a common feature request nowadays, but I think
it's a good feature to have standardized in a sensible way.
Unless someone else volunteers, I can prepare an update to the XEP.
However my spec-writing time is currently taken up with other
important things, so it may not be immediate.
You work on MAM, I'll work on invisibility. ;-)
Standards mailing list