On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I think ‘allergic to dependencies’ is ever so close to NiH, but in this case > I agree that an XPath/XPointer dependency is probably undesirable. I wouldn’t > want to execute network-provided XPath expressions.
That's very fair; maybe I should have said "allergic to dependencies that potentially have a large attack surface" or "allergic to dependencies outside of the Go (in my case) standard library that probably require cgo/FFI madness" —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
